When it comes to the long-term financial health of your nonprofit organization, hiring the right investment consultant or Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) is a significant decision. To identify the provider that best fits your organization’s needs, consider the following questions:
This might seem like an obvious question, but many organizations overlook the implications of this information from the start. Finding a provider with adequate experience working with similar organizations ensures they have firsthand knowledge of your industry.
Is your organization a charitable entity with a single, long-term pool of assets that is perpetual in nature? If so, a provider with institutional expertise would potentially be a good fit to ensure your organization’s spending policy and investment approach are in balance. Another consideration is how you spend your money. Some organizations use income from their long-term investments to fund operations, while others have a separate pool of assets for short-term needs and leverage their long-term pool to fund multi-year granting cycles.
Using the RFP to ask providers about their client base and depth of institutional expertise will help ensure you partner with a firm that can support you in developing an investment program appropriate for your goals.
Embrace what makes you different from peers and do some research about how that aligns—or should align—with your investment approach. It is important to include this information in your RFP, either through the objectives or a custom set of questions.
Perhaps your organization is a growing nonprofit that has taken on debt in order to build a new service site or expand infrastructure. As a result, a covenant with liquidity constraints has been activated on a pool of long-term assets. The debt covenant and its terms makes your organization unique and should be a consideration when setting an allocation for your portfolio’s assets. You will want an investment consultant or OCIO provider to be aware of this type of information in advance so they can confirm their ability to work within your constraints.
Often finding the right financial provider is not about the technical aspects of the work as much as it is about the relationship between your team and the provider.
Considering that many provider relationships last several years, identifying the factors that are important to you can be critical. Do you need someone to get back to you quickly or will a service-level agreement of 24 hours work for you? Does your organization need access to research analysts to discuss ideas or will access to a database suffice?
Even if this type of information does not end up in your RFP, it can help you evaluate candidates in the latter stages of the search. If you have not already created a list of technical and relationship “must-haves” and “must-avoids,” think about putting one together as you go forward.
While you might think that most organizations go into the RFP process with a clear idea of what service they are seeking, we actually find that many organizations are still struggling to answer this question even as they finish the process.
Thus, before going into RFP, we recommend investing the time to evaluate both investment consulting and OCIO against the capabilities of your organization.
Set aside some time with your board to educate them on the potential benefits and drawbacks of each service. If your current provider is not able to help you understand the potential benefits and drawbacks of each, there are a number of firms more than willing to help.
Why is this important?
Receiving a mix of responses from candidates—some about consulting, some about OCIO—can make it more difficult to compare potential providers. This counters the reason for going to RFP in the first place, which is to help you compare and contrast contenders and ultimately choose the best fit for your organization.
Lastly, fees associated with these services are very different. If candidates are responding to your RFP with different services, pricing alone can cover a wide range.
The RFP process can be quite time-consuming if not thoughtfully planned. Questionnaires can become lengthy and can inspire a once-diplomatic board or committee to become contentious with multiple competing opinions.
To avoid this, focus on limiting your questionnaire to relevant questions that will help you uncover the qualitative and quantitative answers you need to make a decision. Even a short RFP of 15 to 20 questions requires a significant amount of time to review answers and compare respondents.
Also, consider restricting the number of RFPs you send out; do not submit your RFP to 20 potential providers when 5 will suffice.
How do you cut down a list of potential providers?
The closer you and your board can come to understanding who you are as an organization and what you need from a provider, the better your overall RFP experience will be.
If you have questions about investment consulting versus OCIO, the RFP process, or any other topic related to the long-term financial health of your organization, please feel free to contact us.
This report was prepared by Fund Evaluation Group, LLC (FEG), a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, providing non-discretionary and discretionary investment advice to its clients on an individual basis. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. Fund Evaluation Group, LLC, Form ADV Part 2A & 2B can be obtained by written request directed to: Fund Evaluation Group, LLC, 201 East Fifth Street, Suite 1600, Cincinnati, OH 45202 Attention: Compliance Department. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed in this report constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities. This report is prepared for informational purposes only. It does not address specific investment objectives, or the financial situation and the particular needs of any person who may receive this report.